PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BA.L vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BA.L^GSPC
YTD Return21.42%6.17%
1Y Return33.69%23.80%
3Y Return (Ann)42.16%6.51%
5Y Return (Ann)27.75%11.47%
10Y Return (Ann)17.40%10.41%
Sharpe Ratio1.931.97
Daily Std Dev19.45%11.66%
Max Drawdown-84.49%-56.78%
Current Drawdown-2.49%-3.62%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between BA.L and ^GSPC is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BA.L vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BA.L achieves a 21.42% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 6.17% return. Over the past 10 years, BA.L has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 17.40%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.41% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%2,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,962.71%
1,473.27%
BA.L
^GSPC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAE Systems plc

S&P 500

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BA.L vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems plc (BA.L) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BA.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.86
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.57
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 3.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 10.96, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0010.96
^GSPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.56
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 7.43, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.007.43

BA.L vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which roughly equals the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BA.L and ^GSPC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.86
1.95
BA.L
^GSPC

Drawdowns

BA.L vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BA.L drawdown since its inception was -84.49%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA.L and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-2.28%
-3.62%
BA.L
^GSPC

Volatility

BA.L vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

BAE Systems plc (BA.L) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 4.05%. This indicates that BA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.77%
4.05%
BA.L
^GSPC